Malaria: Can science cripple development?
5 Comments Published by naman April 16th, 2010 in ResearchThe title is from a provocative article by Bart Knols (of MalariaWorld) on the modern malaria research establishment. I came across the piece through some related commentary at the terrific PloS Speaking of Medicine blog. His central thesis is a somewhat rhetorical question: “Is the bulk of today’s malaria research helping to control malaria?”
As someone within the research confines, Dr Knol’s comments ring true. Even in malaria research institutions in endemic countries, where presumably there is greater pressure to focus on applied and operational questions, most new young scientists are taken by the latest molecular method.
These topics reminds me of a letter to the editor I came across a few years back:
Maintaining health in the tropics requires more than medical intervention after disease strikes. It requires more than drugs and vaccines to prevent disease. It requires something else, hygiene. Next year will be the 100th anniversary of the commencement of the work of Dr. William Gorgas in Panama. That 10-year effort was not accomplished with medicine or global health, it was hygiene: spraying insecticides, eliminating breeding sites, creating efficient drainage, building homes that keep mosquitoes at bay, and many other measures unrelated to clinical or laboratory medicine. Today many of the tropical infectious agents our Society investigates creep out of the conditions created by ignorance of hygiene.
The neglect of hygiene as a tool of disease prevention is lamentable. A simple hygienic practice that could prevent endemic disease often doesn’t happen because no one thought of it. We fly into areas of endemic disease bearing rapid diagnostics and effective therapies, but we neglect to bring the idea for a simple measure of hygiene that could prevent most of the infections being diagnosed and treated. Hygiene has no cache. No one funds research aimed at improving hygiene, and that’s too bad. Hygiene comes with no microsatellite arrays, ELISA wells, or dramatic recoveries in the clinic. Sound hygiene quietly creates communities of healthy people.
Search
Categories
- Advocacy (8)
- Blogroll (6)
- Book review (1)
- Climate (2)
- Communication (13)
- Delivery (9)
- Diagnosis (5)
- Drug resistance (13)
- Heroes (6)
- History (11)
- Operations (4)
- Policy (19)
- Random (11)
- Research (13)
- Surveillance (7)
- Treatment (18)
- Vaccine (5)
- Vector control (8)
- WHO (6)
5 Responses to “Malaria: Can science cripple development?”
Please Wait
Leave a Reply